Pelvic PT Distance Journal Club February 3, 2015
Beth Shelly
Systematic review of 8 RCT which included PFM training
and sexual dysfunction.
Pedro scale - 4 or
5 for most studies (one study rated 7) - fair quality - results interpreted
with caution
Drop outs - five studies had dropout rates over 15% with
one study as high as 52% dropout
Adherence to PFM exercises 19% to 96%
Heterogeneous patients - SUI (3), postpartum (2), POP
(2), GYN cancer (1)
Most often sexual function was recorded as a secondary
outcome
PFM training varied a lot. Individualized, group, with BF
or ES, overflow muscles, home exercises. Unable to draw any conclusions about
best PFM exercise prescription.
·
stronger superficial PFM - better arousal and
orgasm
·
PFM weakness contributes to decreased orgasms
·
increased blood flow and enhanced clitoral
sensitivity
Five studies found a significant intergroup difference in
at least one sexual variable.
Three studies show no difference
Some of the results included improved
·
total FSFI score, all domains of FSFI
·
sensation of a tighter vagina
·
self confidence
·
libido
·
orgasms
·
decreased pain with penetration
·
improved partner gratification
·
improved sexual function related to decreased UI
·
PFM awareness and strength (5)
·
no difference in PFM pressure measurement (1)
·
successful SUI assoc with higher Brink score but
this was not related to improved sexual function
Braeken (2015) Pedro 7 - POP
·
medium correlation between improved PFM strength
and improved sexual function
·
small correlation between improved PFM endurance
and improved sexual function
·
women who described improved sexual function had
a greater increase in PFM strength (than those who did not report a improved
sexual function)
Level 2 evidence that PFM exercises improve some aspects
of sexual function
Grade B recommendation that PFM exercises be used to
improve sexual function, consider adherence
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.