December 4, 2013
Michelle Spicka, DPT
Objective: To determine the effect of a 12 week pelvic
floor muscle training program on urethral morphology and mobility in women with
stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Study Design/Method:
1.
To date, there has not been investigation of the
impact of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training on urethral structure, support or
mobility.
a.
Measurements of urethral trajectory and
acceleration during functional tasks such as coughing have shown that women
with SUI demonstrate a larger excursion of the urethra during coughing
maneuvers than their continent counterparts.
b.
These results suggest that the urethra is not
effectively held in place behind the pubic symphysis to ensure that it is
compressed against the pelvic floor when there is an increase in
intra-abdominal pressure, which in turn suggests that women with SUI have
ineffective endopelvic fascia and/or PFMs that are slow or ineffective in
offering support to the urethra
2.
Women included in the study were over 18, had
symptoms of SUI with or without urge incontinence, noturia or anterior
compartment prolapsed, but not if they had fecal incontinence.
a.
Volunteers who met the screening criteria
underwent urodynamics and those with detrusor instability were excluded
b.
Women found to have neurologic defects, pelvic
mass or prolapsed greater than stage 2 were also excluded
3.
40 women were ultimately chosen with 20 randomly
placed in the intervention group and 20 in the control group
a.
Data collection included a 3-day bladder diary,
bladder volume assessment via trans-abdominal ultrasound, pad test and
completion of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact
Questionnaire. Ultrasound imaging of the
pelvic structures also was performed during coughing and Valsalva in the
lithotomy position and in standing.
4.
Intervention
a.
Women assigned to the PFM strength training
group attended weekly private PT sessions
i.
3 sets of 12 PFM contractions daily
ii.
Reassessment after 12 weeks
1.
There was no difference in the bladder diary,
pad test or questionnaire scores between the groups at the start of the
study. Post treatment, significant
differences were found for the bladder diary and the Incontinence Impact
Questionnaire in the treatment group only.
2.
No change in the vertical position of the
bladder neck relative to the levator plate at rest was noted in both groups
following the study period.
3.
In both groups and positions (supine and
standing), there was more bladder neck displacement during the Valsalva noted
at post-treatment vs pre-treatment.
4.
In the treatment group, in both supine and
standing, there was a significant reduction in bladder neck displacement during
coughing after the study period compared to before the study period. The control group did not demonstrate the
same effect.
Conclusion:
1.
This study demonstrates that supervised PFM
training reduces urethral mobility during coughing and increases the
cross-sectional area of the urethra but does not reduce the extent of bladder
neck excursion seen during maximal effort Valsalva maneuvers.
a.
The action of the PFM has been shown to hold the
urethra in place such that it can be compressed between the anterior vaginal
wall and the pubic symphysis during tasks that increase intra-abdominal
pressure.
2.
Strengthening of the PFMs was not expected to
appreciably improve the integrity of the surrounding connective tissues so
therefore it was not expected that the training program would reduce bladder
neck excursion during maximal effort Valsalva maneuver (which challenges the endopelvic
fascia.
3.
Participants in both groups demonstrated more
bladder neck descent after the 12 week period
a.
Maybe due to learning how to perform a true
maximal Valsalva or being more
comfortable with testing.
4.
PFM contraction strength on maximal voluntary
contraction was positively associated with urethral sphincter length,
cross-sectional area and a surrogate measure for volume.
a.
Suggests that training the PFMs may cause
improvements in striated urethral sphincter volume and function.
i.
Miller et al (Obstet Gynecol 2007) showed that
women without a visible puboccygeus muscle on MRI could still increase their
urethral closure pressures when
performing a PFM contraction.
b.
The researchers of this study postulate that PFM
exercises performed by the treatment group in this study resulted in
hypertrophy of the urethral sphincter.
5.
Also noted was that the 3-day bladder diary
appeared more sensitive to change induced by PFM training than a standardized
pad test
a.
Multiple reasonings for that conclusion
including urge incontinence vs SUI
6.
The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire showed
significant improvements but the Urogenital Distress Inventory did not show any
significant difference in either group.
a.
Choice of questionnaire
Thought Questions:
1. How
does this study affect patient education and physician education…physical
therapy can help with urethral hypermobility!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.