Ann Dunbar PT,DPT,MS WCS
September 5, 2012
Primary Aim: To
investigate the difference in voluntary pelvic floor muscle function in women
with and without clinically diagnosed PGP.
Subjects: 49 consecutive women who were at least 6 months postpartum
and were patients of physical therapists (diagnosis criteria listed in article)
in Oslo , Norway , matched with 49 controls
for age, number of vaginal deliveries and age of her children.
Study Design:
0ne-to-one matched case-controlled study
Methods:
Procedures
- Completed a questionnaire of sociodemographic data,
gynecological health status, and functional status (see pg 151 for
instruments used)
- PFM function assessed by visual observation and vaginal
palpation with subject in supine.
- Vaginal manometry with middle of balloon placed 3.5 cm
internal from vaginal introitus
- Vaginal 3D ultrasound with probe on perineum in
sagittal plane as per recommendations of Dietz (2004)
--In
18 participants this was repeated immediately for test-restest analysis
Outcome measures
Ultrasound measures:
Definitions: levator hiatus area,
pubovisceral muscle length given in study
- Axial plane analyses: measurements of the levator
hiatus area, pubovisceral muscle length, anterior-posterior and transverse
distance of the levator hiatus and levator urethral gap. Captured 3x. One
trial contracton out of 3 producing the greatest narrowing of the levator
hiatus A-P distance was used for further analyses.
- Sagittal plane analyses: measurements of the height and
displacement of bladder, rectum, levator plate. Based on reliable and
valid methods used, more than 50% of symphysis had to be visible to used
for analysis (Majida et al, 2008; Braekken et al, 2009).
- PFM strength calculated as mean of 3 maximal voluntary
contractions utilizing manometry with simultaneous observation with inward
movement of catheter and perineum during PFM contraction (Bo et al, 1990a,
1990b). Vaginal resting pressure was also calculated.
- PFM endurance defined as sustained maximal contractions
with area under curve for 1st 10 seconds utilized for further
analyses.
Frequencies used for categorical data.
Means with standard deviation used for continuous data. Student t-test used for normally distributed
continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U
test for non-normally distributed continuous variables to analyze differences
between cases and controls. Pearson Chi-Square used for categorical data. Odds ratios adjusted for BMI and years of
education. All analysis adjusted for age
and parity. Test-retest intra-tester reliability analyzed using ICC with 95% CI
(see pg 152 for classification). Power calculation: assumed 25% less
constriction of hiatal area to be clinically important. Power calculation done
to determine number of subjects needed for each group.
Results
- 49 women matched according to age and parity; no
significant differences in demographic variables between groups with age,
parity, education level, episodes of UI, and POP.
- Women with postpartum PGP (PPGP) had significantly
higher BMI and had more pain and disability than controls.
- No significant difference in voluntary PFM function
based on manometry but women with PGP had tendency toward higher vaginal
resting pressure.
- Women with PPGP had smallest levator hiatus at rest and
at maximal pfm contraction.
- Women with BMI > 25 kg/m2 had OR of
more than 3 for having PPGP.
- Women with PPGP had tendency to have higher vaginal
resting pressure
The findings of this study demonstrate
no difference in PFM strength, endurance, and in ‘lifting’ ability between
subjects and controls. Compared with matched controls, the levator hiatus
together with BMI are significantly associated with PPGP. Results show that
women with PPGP had a significantly smaller levator hiatus and a tendency
toward a higher vaginal resting pressure. The authors suggest these findings
might indicate increased activity of the PFM.
Results also suggest tendencies for low position of the bladder, greater
reduction in muscle length during contraction and presence of pelvic organ
prolapse in women with PGP.
Strengths: - Measurements of lift and squeeze of PFM contraction
were previously shown to be reliable.
- PFMs are not flat so 3D ultrasound imaging provides
better evaluation of muscle morphology.
- Ultrasonographer was trained and highly skilled.
- Subjects were women with clinically verified PPGP
according to recommended criteria.
- Subjects were closely matched with controls regarding
parity and age.
- Small sample size, weight and height of subjects no
measured clinically
1)
How do the findings from this study shape your thinking about
interventions you would provide for a pt with PGP?
2) In your opinion, what do these
findings suggest about deep stabilizing muscle motor control?
3)
The authors suggest that we can’t assume that prescribing PFM
strengthening exercises will be appropriate for pts with PGP. How would you
evaluate for this to discern the most appropriate exercise prescription for a
patient with PGP?
4)
Research suggests a relationship between PGP and parity related factors (Bjelland et al 2010).
How do these findings influence your evaluation and treatment?
Background Information:
European guidelines for the diagnosis
and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.
(Vleeming et al; 2008. Europ Spine J
17(6):794-819).
Pelvic girdle pain:
¡
Arises in relation to pregnancy,
trauma, arthritis, and osteoarthritis
¡
Experienced between posterior iliac
crest and gluteal folds; may radiate into posterior thigh
¡
Pain may occur in conjunction w/ or
separately in symphysis
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.