Masheb R. M., Kerns R. D., Lozano C. et al. A randomized clinical trial for women with vulvodynia: cognitive-behavioral therapy vs. supportive psychotherapy. Pain. 2009; 141: 31-40.
Appraiser: Stephanie Bush, DPT
1/11/12
Clinical Bottom Line:
Psychosocial treatments for vulvodynia are effective and well-tolerated, and CBT, a directed treatment approach that involves specific pain-relevant coping and self-management skills, yields better outcomes in pain severity, sexual function, and patient satisfaction compared to a less directed approach.
Clinical Question:
Is cognitive-behavioral therapy effective in conjunction with the physical therapy management of a 47 year old female with vulvodynia and dyspareunia with depressive symptoms?
Summary of Study Methods:
· The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized trial to test the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive psychotherapy in women with vulvodynia.
· The participants in the study were 50 women with vulvodynia who were enrolled at the Yale School of Medicine from September 2000 to December 2004.
· The mean age of the participants was 43, average duration of symptoms of 8.5 years, and 66% had a history of psychiatric co-morbidities including major depressive and anxiety disorders as most frequently reported.
· Participants with known or suspected vulvodynia who had been experiencing symptoms of vulvar or vaginal itching, stinging, or burning and/or painful intercourse for at least six months, were 21 years or older, and not pregnant.
· Participants underwent interview screenings including social history, psychiatric and medical histories, status of vulvar symptoms, evaluations by two gynecologists including medical history, pelvic examination and bimanual examination, and laboratory findings.
· Exclusion criteria included psychotic, suicidal, substance abuse, had a life-threatening illness, had started any treatment one month prior to assessment, and other gynecological diagnoses contributing to symptoms.
· The 50 women who met all eligible criteria were randomized to treatment groups from a computer generated randomization schedule.
· Study gynecologists performing follow-up examinations were blind to treatment assignment but the participants and research therapists were not.
· Study gynecologists obtained pain ratings for vulvar vestibulitis via the speculum rating based on pain provoked at the introitus, cotton-swab rating based on point tenderness provoked by palpation at six sites within the vulvar vestibule and erythema rating based on presence and degree of redness of skin.
· Pain measures completed by the participants included the McGill Pain Questionnaire and Female Sexual Function Index.
· Emotional function measures included The Beck Depression Inventory and The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale.
· A global treatment improvement was measured with item, “Up to what point do you feel your vulvar pain has improved following the treatment you received in this study?”
· Treatments were for a duration of 10 weeks for 60-minute individual sessions by a doctoral level research therapist.
· The CBT group involved three phases: orientation to self-management approach, skills acquisition, and skills practice.
o Behavior skills included gate-control, activity pacing and goal setting.
o Gate-control skills identified and eliminated behaviors that increased vulvar pain and identified ones that reduced pain.
o Activity pacing involved limiting activities that increased pain.
o Goal setting indentified observable behaviors and setting weekly goals to attain a desired duration and frequency.
o Cognitive skills included indentifying triggers for negative mood states and thoughts, challenging the negative thought, and then restructuring the negative thought.
o Relaxation skills were taught in a progression starting with diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and relaxation specific to the pelvic floor muscles.
· The SPT group was a non-direct talk therapy following a patient-centered approach.
o The therapist’s role in this group was to have unconditional positive regard, to engage in emphatic understanding and to mirror the patient’s feelings.
o These therapists were instructed to not make interpretations, problem-solve, challenge cognitions or initiate goal-setting.
Study Results:
· Of the 50 participants, 88% completed CBT and 80% completed SPT, and treatment completers attended at least 80% of the 10 sessions.
· At the end of treatment, participants reported significantly less pain on physician’s measures of pain severity including cotton swab and speculum ratings and the MPI and MPQ pain questionnaires; significant improvement from pre- to post- treatment on the FSFI indicating improved sexual function; significantly lower scores on the PASS and BDI indicating improved emotional function.
· CBT group compared to SPT demonstrated a more decline in pain severity on cotton swab palpation, greater improvement in FSFI, and self-reports in significantly better sexual function at the end of treatment.
· Overall reduction on pain severity by 35.8% as measured by the MPI and 37.7% as measured by the MPQ (33% reduction has been shown to be clinically meaningful).
· Maintenance outcomes from post-treatment to 3 months, 6 months and one year follow-ups were performed.
· There was significant improvements in the pain severity subscale of the MPI and pain anxiety as measured by the PASS during the follow-up period.
· Participants in the CBT group reported significantly greater global improvement, treatment satisfaction, and viewed treatment as more credible compared to the SPT group.
Discussion/Comments:
· Participants in both treatment groups significantly improved all outcome measures including pain severity, sexual function and emotional function.
· The CBT group had greater improvements in pain severity on the cotton swab palpation test and overall sexual function and greater global treatment satisfaction compared to the SPT group.
· Outcome measures from post-treatment to one year followed remained the same or improved for self-report pain severity and pain anxiety measures.
· Limitations included the use of vaginal dilators was not used which is a common treatment for vaginismus and the study’s findings may not generalize to other behavioral, medical or nutritional treatments that have been used to treat vulvodynia.
· The results of this study indicate the psychosocial treatments are beneficial in treating patients with vulvodynia.
· CBT, in particular, is effective, well-tolerated, and demonstrates significant improvements in pain severity and patient satisfaction for those diagnosed with vulvodynia.
· Within physical therapy clinical practice, the measures of pain on cotton-swab palpation and FSFI are outcome measures that can be used within the clinic to monitor patient improvements and satisfaction with treatment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.