Dumoulin C, Glazner, C, Jenkinson D. Neurourol and Urodynam 2011;30:746-753.
Beth Shelly November 9, 2011
Second International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society Bristol June 2010 – experts in the field chosen to present and debate and eventually summarize selected topics.
“It is no longer a question of whether PFM training programs work but what components (including adjunct therapies) and combinations there of are most effective.” Page 752
Comparing PFM exercises for SUI to no treatment
· Women who were treated were 17 times more likely to report cure or improvement
· They experienced between 0.8 and 3 few leaks per 24 hours
· Were 5 to 16 times more likely to be continent on pad test
Mixed treatment comparison analysis
· 14 interventions
· 55 trials, 6,608 women
Results
· No clear optimal training regime
· Supervised PFM training programs more than 2 times per month or augmented with biofeedback appear to be more effective
· Figure one page 751
Studies of note
· Ramsay and Thou – Direct vs indirect (hip abductor) PFM exercises. No sig difference
· Ghoneim – PFMT vs imitation (hip abductor) PFM exercises. No sig difference
· Dumoulin – PFMT vs PFMT with TrA training. No sig difference
· Borello-France – supine PFMT vs supine, sit and stand PFMT. No sig difference
· Johnson – maximal PFMT vs submaximal PFMT. No sig difference
Biological rational for PFMT
· Voluntary contraction before and during cough (the knack) should be included in all PFMT regimes
· Improving PFM strength is thought to elevate levator plate, enhance hypertrophy of PFM and increase stiffness of the PFM thus resisting perineal descent with increased IAP
· Therefore PFMT should focus on
o Improving timing of contraction
o Strength
o Stiffness
PFM dysfunction
· Abnormalities of the involuntary response of the PFM during coughing
o Decreased PFM contraction speed
o Decreased PFM contraction force
o Decreased PFM force at peak increased IAP
o No pre-contraction of the PFM
· Women with UI had weaker PFM
· Women with UI had lower levator plate indicating decreased stiffness
· Summary – PFM is deficient
o At rest – tone and stiffness
o During MVC – maximum strength, rapidity, endurance
o During effort – timing and maximal strength
· Evaluations should test for these parameters and exercise routines should address as needed
American college of sports medicine evidenced based progression models for resistance training
· Intensity of exercises and # of repetitions should increase
· Endurance training – 40 to 60% load more than 15 repetitions, less than 90 second rest.
· Strength training – 8 to 12 repetitions at moderate velocity and maximum load with longer rest (1 to 2 minutes) between sets. 2 to 3 times per week building up to 4 to 5 times per week
· Not sure I see the evidence for this in PFMT???
Behavior and adherence strategies
Factors that facilitated | Barriers / impediments | |
Home-based PFMT | Realistic goals and expectations Positive affirmations Follow-up Regular exercise routine Desire to decrease UI Commitment to making exercise part of a daily routine | Insufficient information about the exercises Characteristics of the exercises Competing interests / busy schedule Financial costs Minor psychosocial impacts Illness Length of exercise program |
Participation in PFM weekly exercise class | Desire to decrease UI Sense of responsibility towards the program Close supervision by PT Group support | Illness Medical appointments Planned social activities |
· Those using a routine approach to PFMT adherence and practicing bladder training where 12 x more likely to maintain adherence
· Those using audiotaped instructions were more likely to perform exercises 2x / day.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.